Global Organisation Development Programme Choice — 15 September 2026 Edition

317 programmes · 8 global regions · one evidence-aware field of view for informed programme choice

It is easy for anyone, not merely the emerging AI-native generations now, to access information online, run it past analytic frames and arrive at a decision. This Directory serves as a choice architecture design rather than a recommendation engine for OD education. You can hone your judgment for OD education with it.

Choosing an Organisation Development programme is not simply a question of institution, credential, location or delivery mode. It can also be a choice about the kind of practitioner one is preparing to become. The September 2026 edition of the Global Organisation Development Programme Choice Directory brings together 317 publicly discoverable OD and OD-related programmes across eight regions. It does not rank programmes or accredit providers. Instead, it helps prospective participants move from “Which program me is best?” toward the more useful question:

“What kind of formation, practice and judgement do I need for the work I want to become capable of doing?”

The Directory makes visible differences that programme titles alone often conceal: intellectual and paradigm orientation, behavioural-science inquiry, practitioner formation, Use of Self, faculty ecology, supervision, consequential client-system practice, intervention scope and the public evidence through which these claims can be inspected. It also offers broad research avenues to discerning students of OD.

Its governing principle remains liberal discovery, conservative classification: uncertainty is retained rather than converted into judgement, and absence of publicly observable evidence is not treated as evidence of absence.

What changed in September?

The programme field has expanded from 308 to 317 programmes. More importantly, the Directory now makes its definition of OD, assumptions about practitioner formation and intellectual/paradigm orientations more explicit. The House of Integral Formation for OD Education provides a coherent way of examining theory, inquiry, faculty formation, practitioner maturation and consequential praxis.

A new participant pathway— PURPOSE → ORIENTATION → FORMATION → PRACTICE → FIT —helps readers narrow the global field before inspecting technical classifications and source evidence.

“Dr Joseph George Anjilvelil’s meticulous care and exceptional attention to detail have transformed the Global OD Programme Choice Directory far beyond its initial goal of providing an accessible overview of 317 Organisation Development programmes across eight global regions. Its greatest strength may be the deeper inquiry it invites among those considering their programme options—an inquiry that can educate, broaden perspectives and illuminate the diverse possibilities available within the field of Organisation Development. To call the work extraordinary may seem understated, yet the term captures both its exemplary quality and the remarkable opportunities for growth and exploration it makes possible.”

— Cecile Betit, PhD

Independent Researcher
Research Gate :  https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Cecile-Betit/research
LinkedIn : https://www.linkedin.com/in/cecile-g-betit-69b32843/
Resource : https://inquiryinstitute.com/thoughtfulcitizenhandbook

"...this is a simply unbelievable piece of work here! Extraordinary. "

— Dr. John J. Scherer
Founder & President at Scherer Leadership Center

“After 45 years watching the packaging morph while the content quietly flatten and hollow out, I welcome Dr George’s directory which is honest enough to say a credential isn't a practitioner. As AI makes theory-recall cheap, the scarce thing that remains is judgement under pressure. This Directory asks the right question before the wrong one becomes expensive.”

Allon Shevat
CEO at GR Consulting, Israel

Download the current edition — 15 September 2026

317 programmes · 8 region

Previous public edition

The 15 August 2026 edition is retained for publication continuity and methodological comparison. It contains 308 programmes and represents the Directory before the September formation, paradigm and reproducibility architecture was completed.